arrowHome arrow Written arrow Interviews 2002 to the present arrow Long interview with Marty about Untitled #23, followed by gig review Sunday, 19 November 2017  
The Church
  All I ever wanted to see...was just invisible to me.
 
Home
News
FAQ
Written
Lyrics (ext. site)
Discography (ext. site)
Image Gallery
Video and Audio
Guitar Tab (ext. site)
- - - - - - -
Buy Church Music
Links
Contact Us
- - - - - - -
Old Shadow Cabinet
Top Sites

Official band site
Official Site

 

Discography and Lyrics
Discography, Lyrics, Tours

 

Hotel Womb - Bulletin Boards Dedicated to the Church Fan
Forums

 

 

Steve Kilbey's blog
Steve's blog


Immersion Music - Peter Koppes' label
Peter's Labels' Site

 

Spacejunk - Tim Powles 
Tim's Studio Site

 

Marty Willson-Piper's Official Homepage
Marty's Facebook

 

 Heliopolis - a Steve Kilbey site now hosted here

Steve Kilbey fan site, 

(archived here)

Long interview with Marty about Untitled #23, followed by gig review Print E-mail
Thursday, 18 June 2009
This is a really interesting conversation between Tom Murphy for Denver Westword, and MWP. Originally published at blogs.westword.com/backbeat/2009/06/qa_with_the_churchs_marty_wils.php

Q&A with Marty Willson-Piper: Tom Murphy,Denver Westword

Twenty-nine years into its career, the Church recently released Untitled #23, one of its most accomplished works
in an already remarkable string of albums over the last decade. We had a chance to have a candid conversation
about the band's music, the true meaning of artistic significance and its dazzling array of equipment with the
charming and affable Marty Willson-Piper, one of the band's two main guitarists.


Westword (Tom Murphy): I picked up your new album a few weeks ago and I have to admit that it surprised me a
little in that it was one of the best things your band has ever done.

Marty Willson-Piper: That's what people say about this album. It's an evolution, isn't it? What often happens with
bands is that they don't evolve. It always astonishes me how bands lose the vision of themselves or maybe they
just sort of have one idea and once they've achieved that they have nothing else to say or nowhere else to go and
it's as simple as that.

You cannot listen to anybody, that's the key. If anybody ever asked me after 29 years in the band and great
reviews and touring America and stuff like that what piece of advice I would give it would be, "Don't listen to
anybody when it comes to creativity." Listen to people when it comes to business and logistics, but not creativity.

How you manifest your ideas, that's what it's all about.

WW: There has been talk of the mystical significance of the number in the title to your new album.
Can you tell me a little bit about that?

MWP: I never want to destroy anyone's fun when it comes to mysticism. Well, I'll tell you one thing that happened
with this album is that we had a couple of titles. One title we came up with, I won't tell you because we might
use it again. It was a cool title but it didn't suit this album. Everyone realized that and we went through a few
more but they weren't good as a general title. I had the idea of calling an album "Untitled" something for a while
even as far back as the Uninvited album but it didn't suit that album. So it got cancelled out. One day I called up
Steve [Kilbey] and said "Why don't we go back with that title 'Untitled #24' or 'Untitled #25." And Steve immediately
said, "23, it's a much better number." Apparently that number has more of a mystical significance than 24 or 25.
It just came from that, Steve being somewhat more mystical in his philosophies and readings and understandings of
the universe seemed to think that was a better number.

Is it our 23rd album, it could be if you counted it that way if you counted Best-Ofs and collections and counted
the Remote Luxury album because it was an album here but two EPs in Australia. Do the Internet albums count? Does
Jams count? If you count it up, it's more like 32, which is, interestingly enough, the reverse of 23. Also, I took
the picture on the sleeve of this album. I took all the photographs on the album. It kind of looks like an abstract
painting. If you go to an art gallery and see those sorts of thing, and they're often titled "Untitled #1,"
"Untitled #7," "Untitled #23." I thought there was a connection between that picture and that title.

The EP that we released that isn't out in America, except we will have it available on the tour, the Pangaea EP,
that's the name of the super continent of 250 million years ago. On the CD, if you look on the back, the titles of
the songs are listed as though they are the names of cities in an archipelago. The picture is actually taken from my
photographs of Mexican walls in Oaxaca. If you look in the album credits it says, "MWP Oaxaca Mexico." The Pangaea EP
is a different cover again.

WW: Rolling Stone and Inpress Magazine have written glowing reviews of Untitled #23, and rightfully so. For the last
decade or so, the Church has been a surprisingly prolific band writing some of its best music to date. What do you think
accounted for that creative resurgence? Well, I don't know if I should call it that because you never really broke up.

MWP: Yeah, that's one thing. If you never break up, you're always brewing. We just had a few projects which got finished
around about the same time and we put them all out at the same time because I've got this idea that the Church should make
lots of records. It should make EPs, it should do covers, it should do instrumental albums, it should do vocal albums,
it should have Steve singing, it should have me singing, it should Pete [Koppes] singing, it should have me playing bass,
it should have Pete playing piano, it should be acoustic, it should be electric, it should be all kinds of things. The band
is by nature prolific. We could have hundreds of albums out. As far as the quality goes, if the quality doesn't
suffer, it just depends on how long you spend on molding it into what you want to be. That's what we do, we find places
where we need to have something out and we ask if it's got where we want it to be and release it and then do some shows.
We don't worry too much about it.

Every album is a reaction to the one before it. Like with the Beatles, Revolver was a reaction to Rubber Soul, and
Sgt. Pepper's was a reaction to Revolver. We don't try to make the same record, we try to make a reaction to the record
before and somehow it always sounds like us no matter who is playing which instrument. We swap instruments quite a lot.
That explains the chemistry and the prolific nature of the band, how we're always writing and evolving. We have our own
record label, and Tiare Helberg and I work a lot on the artwork, design and the t-shirts. We have sort of have this cottage
industry of ideas and that's basically how we want the Church to work. It's kind of an art project that doubles as a really
cool rock and roll band.

WW: Was your band consulted on including "Under the Milky Way" in the Donnie Darko soundtrack? You've said, more or less,
that you think that inclusion hasn't sparked increased interest in the music of the Church. Why do you think that is?

MWP: No [we were not consulted.] But that's the problem when you've been going for 29 years. You get so tired of people
being interested, then waning, then being interested and then waning. We've been around for three generations of people who
are ten-years-old. I don't wane with a band; I like them from beginning to end. I don't lose interest in a band unless they
do something crap. And even then I go, "Oh what a shame." I don't say I'm not interested in them anymore. I'll buy the next
record as well, or at least listen to it and give it a chance. One of our reviews said, "This is the best 23rd album ever made.
"That's probably true. I don't know where Dylan or Zappa were on their 23rd albums, it could have been one of their better
records or one that was rubbish.

WW:
The Church has had a distinctive and influential guitar sound that has perhaps not received the recognition it deserves.
If I may ask, what kinds of rigs and guitars have you used to create your unique sound?

MWP: I'll answer that question in three parts.

First of all, recognition is in the eye of the beholder. My top ten guitarists aren't in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.
What does that tell you? Success is what it's all about? You know what, I know it isn't all about that. I know Rory Gallagher,
Paul Kossoff, Bill Nelson, Richard Thompson, Tom Verlaine, Robert Fripp and whoever else I could think of in a row that aren't
in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame are amazing. I don't care what anybody thinks. I don't care if people agree with me, I accept
it if they disagree with me, but those seven guys I just named off the top of my head, oh yeah and Harvey Mandel and Terje Rypdal,
nine, I know those nine guys are not getting in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.

So how can I care about getting recognition, if nine people I love, and who have been around and what geniuses they are since
day one, aren't getting in there. If it isn't going to come around for them, it isn't going to come around for me. And the people
who like what I do, that's enough. That's great. People come up to me and say, "Hey, Marty, I love the way you play guitar." Wow.
Imagine being a guitarist in the world and having people say that to you. That's amazing. I'm completely content with that, I don't
need some kind of institution to recognize me. And if they do, great. If they do, I'll be grateful and then say, "Now let me tell
you about Paul Kossoff, Tom Verlaine, Richard Thompson, Bill Nelson, Robert Fripp..." and that will be my speech.

It's an emotional thing for me. I guess I've learned some kind of adept skills on the guitar but it was never about that. If I do
something that looks tricky, it comes from an emotional place. I'm interested in the tone, I'm very interested in doing something
very different. Having said that, I've listened to Derek Trucks, and he's amazing, and he's sort of a very traditional slide
guitar player in a blues band, and he's completely the opposite of what I do, but I think he's brilliant. Or Jeff Beck, there's a
real recognized amazing guitar player.

As for my and Peter's rig, we both usually use a Vox AC 30. He has a 50-watt Marshall and I have a 15-watt Orange. In the studio
I've got a 100-watt Orange. I've got 3 '60s AC 30s and with a blend of those I come up with some sort of great tone. Peter has got an
AC 30 and his Marshall 50 and he uses a kind of Danelectro amp, it's an effects amp. Sometimes he uses it for his tone as well.
For this tour Matchless have leant me an amp. So I've got a very colorful rig at the moment. My guitar tech Davida, who plays
with me when I'm doing solo shows, she's leant me her 15-watt Orange and Matchless leant me their 30-watt amp. So I've got a green amp
and an orange amp so I'm looking very autumnal one side and sort of springy on the other. So it might change my mood by just looking around.
I might look around and go, "Ooh...the autumn sound." Anyway...

Loads of pedals...I use a big, long Boss volume pedal, which is one of the most pieces of effects that I use in my rig. It has nothing
in it but it sort of gives you expression with your foot in your fingers. Expressing notes with a volume pedal is an amazing thing.
Of course I've got one of those OC-1, stereo chorus vibratos. The one I'm actually using on the road is Peter's, but I've got one in
the studio in England. I've got one of those old Boss yellow pedals, the C-1s, I think they're called. I've got one of those funny green
Line-6 pedals for reverse delay. I try to use the authentic stuff. I've also got a UE-405 Ibanez effects unit with a compressor, analog delay,
stereo chorus and a parametic, which I never use. I've also got an Electro Harmonix Big Muff but it sounds kind of muddy because it was fixed
and has never sounded the same. When you're a guitarist you can tell the difference between muddy in a good way and muddy in a bad way.
Mine is muddy in a bad way. I've usually got a wah pedal but I may buy one on tour to use in places in songs where it makes sense.
Usually I like to use [an Ernie Ball Crybaby.]

I've also got a '59 Jazzmaster; it's my main guitar. I also play a Roger McGuinn Limited Edition Rickenbacker 12-string, strung the
other way around; it's got compressors in it. Rickenbacker, I must say, have been very kind to me. That guitar I just took in to
get fixed up because it was in such a disgraceful state. It had so many things wrong with it it was unbelievable, and they fixed
the whole thing up for me brilliantly. I'm getting a Rickenbacker bass for this guitar and I'll be playing it if I can get it to work.
I saw the bass player from Dead Meadow play and he had a really warm sound, so I hope it can work out. I also use a Takamine acoustic 12-string,
which I've had for 25 years and it's a really nice guitar. It doesn't look like it will be but it sounds great.

Peter's playing a new-ish strat and he has '59 Telecaster but I don't think he's bringing it on this tour. He's also got a Taylor 12-string.
He's probably going to bring the AC 30 on this tour so he can get a dirty sound as opposed to my clean sound. He's probably bringing a
Fender Deluxe and an effects amp. He's got a huge number of pedals I couldn't even begin to tell you what they are--20 pedals or something.
He uses a [Sony] GP-5 to get those symphonic sounds. And I think that's about it for me and Pete.
ps stage gear pic here [from Steve Kilbey's blog] 

Tom also wrote a nice review of the show itself
 
The ChurchJune18 09
Tom Murphy

Before playing the luminously lush "Day 5," Steve told us a story
about how he had met Joe Walsh, and when he asked Joe how the Eagles
were doing, Joe said saying, "I hate them fuckers when I'm not
drinking." And for the rest of the night, between songs, Steve amused
us with jokes and anecdotes, few of which seemed rehearsed. Kilbey
struck poses with his legs apart, low to the floor. Marty in
particular performed not just superbly but with a playfulness that
you could see in his expressions. Highlights of the show included a
particularly sweeping and moving versions of a personal favorite of
mine, "A Month of Sundays," as well as an extended version of "You
Took
" that had the band jamming on the song for over ten minutes --
none of them was boring or self-indulgent. The show would have closed
with a stretched out and fiery take on "Reptile," but we were treated
to two encores, with Kilbey telling us he was too old to lie and that
we were a wonderful audience.

The Church gave its all for this show -- like not nearly enough bands seem to.

The Church Set List
1. Tantalized
2. Block
3. Day 5
4. North, South, East and West
5. Happenstance
6. After Everything
7. Almost With You
8. A Month of Sundays
9. Deadman's Hand
10. Pangaea
11. You Took
12. Operetta
13. Under the Milky Way
14. Reptile

Encore 1
1. An Interlude
2. Space Saviour

Encore 2
1. Hotel Womb


Bias: The Church has written music that is part of the soundtrack of my life.
Random Detail: Marty actually did end up playing a Rickenbacker bass
at the show.
By the Way: Untitled #23 is one of the best rock albums of recent years.
Last Updated ( Saturday, 01 August 2009 )
Most Read
 
top


Mambo is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.
design by mambosolutions.com
Page was generated in 0.023923 seconds: Left = 0.008381, Top = 0.008320, Main=0.008721, Right = 0.014541 Bottom=0.008865

 
0 queries executed